6.24 — “Second Chances”

6.24 — “Second Chances”

Plot: The Enterprise returns to Nervala IV, eight years after Riker participated in the evacuation of a scientific outpost there during a previous tour of duty aboard the Potemkin. To their surprise, the away team finds… Lt. Riker, trapped there following a transporter malfunction that created two copies of the lieutenant, stranding one behind a phased distortion field on the surface.

Thoughts: This episode wins me over by avoiding two science fiction clichés. First Tom Riker (as I will call him) does not turn out to be an evil twin à la “The Enemy Within” (TOS 1.5) or “Mirror, MIrror” (TOS 2.4). Second, he does not try to murder the other Riker over jealousy/thwarted love when he has the chance, or vice versa, an act which would invalidate everything we know about Riker up to this point. While evil twin episodes can be entertaining, what we get instead feels grown-up and like serious science fiction.

How much are we a product of our experiences, and how much an expression of our inner nature? How different might you be, not just in terms of opportunity, but as a person if luck at earlier points of your life had turned out a little differently? This is an important question in a world filled with inequality, and the answer has implications for questions such as appropriateness of resource redistribution.

One great thing about this episode is that Will Riker, Tom Riker, and Deanna Troi each have distinct points of view which are honored. The events look totally different from each of their perspectives.

I’ve said it before: the transporter is bloody terrifying. Surely the replication of Riker is a scientific breakthrough which the crew should take more interest in? It’s amazing no one seems to have thought of this possibility before.

Troi clearly has a conflict of interest evaluating whether Tom Riker is fit for duty. As we’ve observed before, she’s terrible at her job, probably not even the third best counselor on the ship. As she sets aside her feelings for Tom Riker in order to pursue her career, I thought, “These characters aren’t so different.” I realize Troi can’t decide to follow Tom without leaving the show, but I still would have liked to see her do it. As long as she could keep her commission and active duty status on the new ship, of course, which is not made as clear as it should be. But why not?

All in all, an intriguing episode, worthy of revisitation. 4 out of 5 re-phasing distortion fields.

http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Second_Chances


by

Tags:

Comments

2 responses to “6.24 — “Second Chances””

  1. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Indeed, why not. I am thinking it’s because she is older now than she was then, and not so ready to change her entire life to be with one other person (and particularly with one that in some ways she’s just met).

    Overall I wish this story had done more with the material… how did Tom’s experience change him, exactly? How have Will’s? Can we have something more substantive than a name change to explore the difference between their characters?

    I found this interesting in principle but not so much in reality. The two most interesting parts to me were:

    1) Riker pointing out that Deanna should be careful bc Tom is the same as he is and will leave her if he gets a career opportunity (not necessarily so, and poor sportsmanship of Riker to say so).

    2) Data and Worf discussing why the Rikers have trouble getting along. Having one’s uniqueness challenged is indeed disturbing! Also I actually think Worf would get along better with another Worf than he expects. And I feel like Geordi and Data would too. I think Troi would hate her double self. I think having strong hobbies would be helpful in liking a double of yourself in that it provides common ground.

    I think I’d probably enjoy a double of myself in some ways and be annoyed in other ways… more to Data’s first point, about seeing things in the double you don’t like in yourself. What do others think?

  2. Kevin Black Avatar

    Agree that this episode is better at raising questions than actually delving deeply into the answers. Would I enjoy meeting my double? Well, I would probably find it excruciatingly embarrassing, and very educational in ways that aren’t entirely pleasant. Whether I could get along with my double long-term, I think perhaps? It would be nice to know more people whose interests closely match my own. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *