4.25 — “In Theory”

4.25 — “In Theory”

Plot: A co-worker of Data’s, Lieutenant Jenna D’Sora, is discouraged with her romantic prospects. She decides that Data , her uncritically supportive friend, would make an excellent romantic partner. Sensing an opportunity to expand his knowledge of human relationships, and to be increasingly supportive, Data obliges her wish after consulting with various members of the crew. Meanwhile, an exploratory expedition into a dark matter nebula turns dangerous for the ship.

Thoughts: This is the first episode of TNG to be directed by Patrick Stewart (Jonathan Frakes had already directed three at this point; Stewart will eventually direct four more). I am tempted to blame him for it falling a bit flat.

Showing how Data interacts with “ordinary” crew members is a surprisingly rich vein of story. We have rarely seen him interact with anyone other than Geordi outside a crisis or purely work situation. It doesn’t seem strange to me that others would want to explore what it would be like to romance Data. In fact, it happened already, in “The Naked Now,” with Tasha. That situation probably worked better because Tasha took charge (and perhaps limited her expectations to what Data was capable of delivering). Lt. D’Sora, after making the first move, seems more passive. She doesn’t seem to be empathetic enough to understand Data, and significantly overestimates Data’s ability to understand her. Meanwhile, the writers seem bent on exaggerating Data’s awkward understanding of interpersonal relations.

I note there are no leering references in the episode to Data being “fully functional.” Gene Roddenberry, who would die on October 24, 1991, had truly relinquished control of the series by this point. 

Unlike so many other Data episodes, this episode seems to proceed with a point of view that Data does not have feelings, and so is fundamentally unlike D’Sora. What does Data learn during this episode? Why is he so motivated to please D’Sora, or to become human? I don’t think any new insight is gained, unless that insight is that Data really is just a machine without a hope of being human, which doesn’t seem consistent with previous episodes.

There were opportunities, surely, for some emotional moments to be inserted. I was expecting Data to discover that he is unexpectedly distracted at work by his new relationship, or to experience confusion, if not outright sadness, following the end of the relationship. But no.

After the amusing scenes where Data seeks advice (Troi gives the best advice, but Worf FTW), the story of the relationship seems to be told from D’Sora’s point of view, which is an odd choice. As far as we know, Data has no point of view about the subject.

We have seen Brent Spiner insert humanity into Data in a number of previous episodes. I suspect Patrick Stewart stifled this, which, if true, was ungenerous towards his castmate. The comedy inherent in a human dating a emotionless android works fine in the context of a short film, but this is a series with ongoing characters, and the more interesting choice for Data would have been to discover that he has more emotional capacity than he suspects (not less).

I wrote that the last two episodes may be the most interesting Crusher and La Forge episodes yet. Data’s most interesting episode, alas, is still either “The Measure of a Man” or “The Offspring.”

I was pleased to see a woodwind quintet–I used to play in one of those in high school! Brent Spiner does not mime playing the oboe particularly well. Did you catch this episode’s references to Star Trek II (shooting torpedoes into a nebula) and Star Trek IV (transparent aluminum)? 

The less said about the nebula subplot the better. I feel a bit like Data myself–my notepad says “So far, this subplot with the anomalies seems strangely unfocused.”

Data may be a bad boyfriend, but this is a romantic thing to say: 

DATA: You are much more than that, Jenna. I have written a subroutine specifically for you. A program within the program. I have devoted a considerable share of my internal resources to its development.

I will have to remember to use this line the next time I attend a science fiction convention.

2.5 of 5 glasses of Claman Sherry.

http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/In_Theory


by

Tags:

Comments

14 responses to “4.25 — “In Theory””

  1. Randi Cohen Avatar

    What a missed opportunity for an exploration of human love and what makes us human!  Squandered in order to play a recurring character for cheap laughs.  For shame, Patrick Stewart and the writers, for shame.

    It would have been great if somebody actually advised Data as to how humans express, convey and understand love (Deanna, isn’t this part of your job??).  Like: acceptance, validation, encouraging the partner to achieve their goals, warmth, affection, sex, time together, gifts, trying to fill the other’s needs before he or she asks in little and big ways, remembering important dates, compliments, etc.  Not something that a person just figures out by instinct, really.  We learn by watching others, and it’s complicated!

    It would have been way more interesting if Data had succeeded in being an exemplary boyfriend, until his girfriend noticed he did not seem to miss her when she was away or need her for anything or perhaps he was simply too perfect… what a much more interesting story that would have been.  Too bad.

  2. Kevin Black Avatar

    sunny jim​ pointed out how retrograde the episode is in some ways with respect to sex roles. There’s the groan inducing conversation with Miles O’Brien and Keiko about Miles leaving his socks on the floor for her to pick up. Then there’s Jenna, who just wants a man to treat her nice, but keeps getting mixed up with such jerks.

  3. Kevin Black Avatar

    I don’t have any evidence, but I suspect Brent Spiner might have stood up for his character more if Stewart hasn’t been directing. It’s harder to say no to the star of the series than it is to the hired director of the week.

  4. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Makes sense.  Miles and Keiko as characters make me wonder if the writers ever were married or had a relationship?  They just seem to be bizarre in terms of the way they relate… like the Honeymooners plus ethnic stereotyping?  And a token career for her which we never see being of any use to the ship whatsoever?

  5. Kevin Black Avatar

    I can’t at the moment call to mind what Keiko’s career is. Does it have something to do with botany?

  6. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Yes, she is a botanist of some kind.  There’s a scene of her at some point wearing a weird apron and working in the fields, during the wedding episode.

  7. Randi Cohen Avatar

    You know, I rewatched this, and actually, I think data is not a bad boyfriend at all! Speaking as a mom, the idea of a husband who would want to arrange all the closets by type and color of clothing and clean the house is nice! And I would personally not get too hung up on whether he was a mindful kisser or whatnot since i doubt most people are, at least once they are into a relationship for a while… the only difference is that data admits it. I kind of think that Jenna is a surreptitious commitment-phobe who is turned off by guys seeming too attentive or trying too hard.

    That being said, I would think that it could be troubling, say, if she were in danger and he were unconcerned. But I kind of think he would be concerned, because he has emotions to some extent (like that episode where he tried to kill the merchant of Venice guy for being a murderous creep).

    So overall, I totally think there would be a dating market for data… maybe human android love could be the next frontier after human Trill love…

  8. Kevin Black Avatar

    Well, human nature being what it is, there would certainly be a meat market for Data. Dating, maybe! The whole emotion thing–maybe he just wants to have the relationship to explore what it means to be human, but why does he want to be human? Why is he trying at all? I thought the script writers and director (Patrick!) let down the character by apparently concluding he is a toaster after all.

    Meanwhile, Jenna does seem to be seriously confused about what she wants or what she’s looking for or what she even expects of Data. Maybe she has been interacting with him as a co-worker for a long time, and never really thought about his limitations in a more intimate setting?

  9. Kevin Black Avatar

    I’m not quite as despairing as you are over mindful kissing, but every relationship has to work out for itself its own priorities and rituals.

  10. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Haha, you have always been a romantic, Kev. But well said!

    I think that typically women choose emotionally unavailable men because they are fearful of intimacy but unable to admit it. I notice Jenna was most “into” Data when he seemed least invested in her, and the moment he started to invest (albeit imperfectly) was the moment she started to pull away. Honestly, he was no more awkward than Geordi. 

    Although she said the problem was his lack of emotion, I am not so sure.

    Btw, how annoying is it that he is supposed to ignore her offer to go away after she gives him a gift??? Typical female mind games.

  11. Kevin Black Avatar

    So maybe Jenna is the toaster. I think the point is, they could probably work out routines together that are both comfortably familiar and to their mutual advantage. Assuming that Data cares one way or the other about anything (and if he doesn’t, then what’s it to him?). But then, can you really have the love and trust part of the relationship.

    One thing that struck me is that when Data lost his daughter, Lal, he made sure to download all of her memories so that she could live inside him and he could remember her. With Jenna, it’s “Then I will delete the appropriate program.” Not very consistent!

  12. Randi Cohen Avatar

    I am not sure what is meant by the love and trust part of the relationship, but certainly Data is extremely trustworthy.  Love is harder to define… it calls to mind the question of what love means anyway.  I think if love means acknowledging a person’s self (gratifying and disappointing) and accepting them as they are, learning to please them and challenge them, making a life with them, I don’t see why Data would be disqualified from doing any of that.  The only piece I would wonder about being lacking is (1) missing her when she is gone (similar problem with Lal… but possible to make a first attempt at it, as he does in that episode) and (2) having fun with her and (3) accepting love from her (he could learn to do this on a basic level but not sure if he could receive it with the type of emotional impact a human would experience, i.e. shared gaze).  Also, I am not sure if Data fully understands the concept of play/enjoying himself.  He does express and follow curiosity, so that is along the lines of play, but not sure if it is quite there.  What do you think?

  13. Kevin Black Avatar

    So by trust, I mean developing that sense of emotional security with the other person which may be a product of the things you mention. When I say “I trust you” to my partner, I don’t mean that I’m ready to co-sign a bank account or a loan with her, or that I hold beliefs that she will not run away or break our relationship agreements (although those things are true); I mean I feel that my heart is safe with you; I know you have my back, imperfect people though we are. It’s that level of comfort and relaxing in each other’s presence that Data and Jenna might find hard to achieve. Psst sunny jim, I’m talking about ya. 🙂

    I think Data understands recreation–he certainly has a lot of hobbies (painting, science experiments, Sherlock Holmes). I”m not sure that he understands the quiet enjoyment of having company. He does not isolate himself, however, so he must have it at an elemental level, maybe he’s just closed it off somehow?

  14. Randi Cohen Avatar

    I don’t know, it seems to me many people feel that kind of trust with data, at least on afriendship level, and Jenna does from the beginning. He is extremely loyal and nonjudgmental. I think it just got disrupted when he started developing the dating program. But clearly they had it while working together. Maybe he just needs to have the quiet enjoyment piece pointed out to him so he can develop in that area. Regardless of the nonsense the writers pulled though he is clearly not a toaster.

    (If he had you and sunny Jim around he might have figured more our about romance! Miles and Keiko are not the best teachers. .. notice he did not even ask their advice! )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *