1.10 — “Hide and Q”

1.10 — “Hide and Q”

Plot: The Enterprise is flooshing to the rescue of some distressed miners on a distant planetoid when it runs smack into Q’s Tholian Web from “Encounter at Farpoint.” Yes, Q is back, and he wants to test the humans again for some reason best known to the writing staff. The focus is on Riker this time, who receives from Q, as a gift, the full power of the Q Continuum. Our best and brightest has been chosen to Godhood. Will he be corrupted by power?

Thoughts: This episode is preachy, moralistic, cheesy, and verbose. But it has something good going for it: watching it, I felt like I did not know what was going to happen from one moment to the next. What a difference that makes! I admit, I liked it. I really did.

Which is not to say that there aren’t problems. The worst, I’m afraid, is the continuing sexism of the writers. Yar is humiliated by horrible dialogue and plotting, in which the first thing the writers can think of to do is to put her in a “penalty box” and make her cry. I will just pretend I didn’t hear what they made her say to the Captain at the end of this scene. Then, when Geordi is gifted with sight, the first thing he does is make a comment about Yar’s appearance. The best gift Q can think of to give Worf is a woman as his very own possession. Yes, a purely sexualized Klingon woman, in fetish lingerie, and he immediately indulges himself by belting her. The writer’s room needs serious therapy.

Watching Jonathan Frakes play Riker–I don’t know what to say. I’m starting to enjoy it. The way he poses all the time, never more ridiculously than after getting his extra powers. I need a standee with Riker in that pose to put in my office at work.

Let’s face it: Riker is a penis. He’s false, smarmy, and a total dumbass. But he is our false, smarmy dumbass. I think he’s growing on me. Am I crazy?

Another thing I don’t like is the continuing theme of social evolution. According to TNG, we are moving up a one-way ladder of social development, and the end point is in the Q Continuum, or beyond. I don’t buy it. It reminds me of eugenics, and the 1930s. It seems like a convenient excuse to condescend to outsiders (see: “Lonely Among Us” and “Justice”). Maybe it was possible to think this way when Ronald Reagan was president, before the first Gulf War. It seems quaint, at best, today.

Q appearing in historic military gear hearkens back, again, to the character’s roots in “The Squire of Gothos.” John de Lancie’s hair looks terrible. But I like that the character is so fond of dressing up–and I love him as Data. He might break the TOS record, held by Khan and Lenore Karidian, as the guest-star-of-the-week with the most costume changes. And he is a good performer. I don’t buy that this alien from another galaxy would get in a Shakespeare quoting contest with a 26th century starship captain–I mean, that’s ridiculous–but it’s almost worth it, just because of the actors.

So, strangely–even though there are false notes everywhere… I enjoyed it. Grade: Pass.

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Hide_and_Q


by

Tags:

Comments

14 responses to “1.10 — “Hide and Q””

  1. Randi Cohen Avatar

    are you crazy for liking this episode, kev? maybe. i guess i could not add up so much bad to “so bad it’s good”. more later. 

  2. sunny jim Avatar

    Perhaps a holdover from when these were airing, but in general, I like any episode with Luaxanna Troi, and dislike any episode with Q. 

    Riker is really just such a nob in this one.  The chest-thrust pose, the smugness, the immature thought process…  At this point in the series, I really just don’t like him.  If he had any actual insight, he would have known that the “gifts” he gave his crew mates would fall flat. 

    This episode does introduce some great costume moments, however:  Klingon fetish gear, Wesley’s gay pride jumpsuit, and Q in a truly horrible version of a Starfleet uniform (and the Napoleon costume that looks like it was raided from a high school drama department’s wardrobe closet). 

    As an aside, we didn’t have to wait for Wil Wheaton to grow up to know that he wouldn’t end up looking like that

    I can’t say that I like this episode, but I do like it more now than I did the first time around.

  3. sunny jim Avatar

    Oh – and I forgot to mention – another “let’s put some rocks in front of a scrim, and light it a funny color – that makes it an alien planet, right?”

  4. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Picard gets to show off his superpower (quoting Shakespeare).  Riker gets to have actual superpowers.

    Save a child or try to prevent absolute power from corrupting absolutely?  Ummm, it seems like saving a child kind of wins over an abstract principle to me.  Total no-brainer.  If having more power than someone else automatically made a person or species take advantage, shouldn’t we just confine ourselves to staying on Earth rather than encountering cultures with less technological advancement?  Can seeing that type of suffering and staying your hand to keep a promise be seen as anything less than selfishness in the end?  People confront moral quandaries and conflicting imperatives all the time, but saving life obviously should come at the top of the priority list.   Anybody familiar with the entire superhero genre knows that it is possible to use your powers for good.  So basically this whole episode is setting up a straw man.

    Also, can Riker possibly get any more smug or self-satisfied?  Apparently so!  Ugh.

    Ummm, does shortening Wesley’s lifespan by 10 years really count as a gift?  Did Q’s gift to Riker include Q-level insensitivity?  And this is less potential misuse of power than saving a child how, exactly?

    I don’t quite get Giordi’s choice to go back to being blind, given that apparently it is painful.  It seems silly to refuse a gift freely given because you don’t like the giver (perhaps there is a fear that Q will hold over his head his new sight and threaten to take it away again?  But really Q could threaten him with anything, so it seems like that is not really a logical concern.  If the reasoning were more that his current level of sight enables him to make a unique contribution then perhaps I could buy that although still a bit of a stretch.).

    The Klingon female… really???  What on earth kind of misogynistic craziness is that??  I am giving this episode negative stars just based on that alone.

    So… the overall message of that whole scene is what?  That superpowers including the ability to heal the sick and raise the dead are useless to humanity because we have not earned stuff ourselves?  Does anybody actually buy that for half a second?  I think it requires an assumption that the world and nature is fair and just, which it clearly is not.  Ask anyone with cancer or with a child who is ill or with a tragedy in their past and I guarantee that if you ask whether they would get rid of those things with a snap of the fingers if they could the vast majority of people would say yes.  Obviously.  Of course it is our imperfections that make us who we are and our journey of growth and improvement that gives us purpose, but there is nothing noble about spurning a gift of that magnitude either.  No doubt challenges do not end with gaining that level of power, they just change their nature.

    The moral message here is by turns blindingly obvious and completely nonsensical.

    Ugh.  I did not think it could get worse than the first episode, but I think it just did!

    (Also, is it necessary for Q to be tortured at the end?  That seemed a bit overly dramatic.  And not sure what exactly he did wrong as far as the Q Continuum is concerned.  I prefer an ending like Squire of Gothos, Q reads more as a cruel/clumsy teenager than as a criminal mastermind.)

    Rating: Muskets set to overload  Hopefully exploding and taking this episode with them.

  5. Kevin Black Avatar

    There is a heavy-handed fairy tale aspect to the “I will give my shipmates gifts” routine… I think I was amused by it because it’s so old fashioned, and seems so out of place today. Is this kind of story even told in children’s cartoons now? Moralizing, however, was still cool in 1987 (at least, cool enough for TNG season 1).

  6. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Well, I can tell you that Team Umi Zoomi and Thomas Train would not have not have been at all stumped on that save-the-child thing.  And they could both tell you that the best gift is to be Really Useful.  Cartoons have gotten a heck of a lot better since my day when Sylvester was chasing Tweety Bird and Road Runner was blowing up Wile E Coyote.

  7. sunny jim Avatar

    I keep thinking about the Klingon sex toy.  If Worf’s biggest problem is that he’s lonely, an ersatz Klingon woman isn’t going to solve the problem.  Even pandas in the zoo won’t mate with just any panda thrown into the cage with them. 

    If Riker really wants to make Worf not be lonely, he has to make Klingon culture different enough that more Klingon women want to join Starfleet, and make Starfleet the kind of place that more Klingon women want to work.  If there were several age- and culturally- appropriate candidates available for Worf to form a relationship with, then maybe he wouldn’t be so lonely. 

    Of course, that’s far too complicated a scenario to explain in the 60 seconds or so that they give that situation.

  8. Kevin Black Avatar

    Randi, you raise good points. They were clearly going for a moral like “You should learn to be content with who you are, and with your own limitations, instead of craving power you don’t have”–but it was a big fail, for the reasons you point out. I guess I just find the crashing fail to be amusing, and even a little endearing in its earnest ineptitude (that’s your morning alliteration–no charge). Also, Riker is so ridiculous at this stage, you can almost completely let go of taking him seriously, which helps? Maybe I was just in an irrationally euphoric state of mind when I watched it.

    Saving a child is kind of a no-brainer, except that when your technique for doing this is magically restoring the dead, it becomes hard to draw limits and boundaries. I can see this becoming a problem. Whose death is not worth reversing? And then what?

  9. Kevin Black Avatar

    sunny jim, one thing the whole gift giving episode illustrates is that the writers still don’t know who these characters are, or what makes them tick, and they have no idea yet what to do with Worf. I hear this changes later (especially with Worf).

    Jamie Fenderson,  24th century–you’re right! D’oh.

  10. sunny jim Avatar

    I think what I was trying to get at with my long-winded scenario above is that people’s fundamental problems and greatest desires are usually much more complex than what was pictured here.  Riker would have been better served setting Wesley up with a Physics Experiment of the Month subscription, getting Data some modern art, perhaps a nice fruit basket for Geordi… 

  11. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Good question about counselor troi’s absence. i imagine if she were there she would have tried to talk some sense into riker?

  12. Randi Cohen Avatar

    right. except i do not think even now that any human would act as ridiculously as riker. i think most of us would make the superman choice. this is why i think the show talks the talk about human superiority but does not walk the walk.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *