3.20 — “The Way to Eden”

3.20 — “The Way to Eden”

Plot: The Enterprise takes on board six colorful renegades, traveling through space on a stolen cruiser in search of the legendary planet Eden. Their wild clothes, groovy songs, and (somewhat) passive resistance techniques evoke space hippies. Unfortunately, these renegades are cultishly following a charismatic leader whom Spock opines is insane.

Thoughts: This episode is supposed to be a famously bad episode. James Doohan and Walter Koenig both said they don’t care for it, and D.C. Fontana had her name taken off it (although this may have been more in reaction to the degree to which her script was rewritten than based on the final content). Eugene and Torie at TheViewscreen.com hated it, each giving it a score of “Warp Core Breach” on a scale of 1 to 6 (Torie suggested the episode should be subtitled, ““God, doesn’t it feel GREAT to punch a hippie?” Which is pretty funny). I must be undiscriminating, because I enjoyed it very much.

Perhaps the songs and costumes feel too wild for some people? Does it read as condescension or disrespect for 1960s counter-culture? I believe we have enough distance on those times now for a critical reappraisal. I thought the songs were rather good. The dubbing was atrocious, but I can overlook that.

Passive resistance and counter culture are interesting topics, certainly worthy of examination by Star Trek. The cult dynamic adds another interesting layer. Spock’s identification with the seekers is an interesting twist for his character, displaying humility about his passion for logic and choice to avoid emotion. This is a big episode for him–it feels like the endpoint of a long arc through the whole series. The ethos of the speakers is not illogical; for Spock it may represent another way out of his emotional hell of unbelonging.

In this episode we find out Chekov’s first name. I thought his scenes were nice, even if they portrayed him as more of a square (Herbert!) than implied by earlier episodes. His argument with Irina over the merits of life in Starfleet was a good piece of dialogue–both characters were absolutely correct, from their own points of view. Her accent sounds Transylvanian instead of Russian, however–making Chekov sound positively authentic by comparison. Wouldn’t they be more likely to speak to each other in Russian? Maybe she was from Transylvania.

it’s the sign of a dramatic, well-plotted episode when cast members beam down to a planet for the first time in Act IV. There were only two things I didn’t like about this episode. Some of the scenes on the bridge of crewmembers rocking out to the groovy music are overdone. Some more subtlety, please? Also, no one but Spock should be able to perform a Vulcan neck pinch.

3.5 out of 5 Herberts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Way_To_Eden


by

Tags:

Comments

3 responses to “3.20 — “The Way to Eden””

  1. R. Alex Reutter Avatar

    This is absolutely condescending to counterculture.  They’re a bunch of naive young idealists who get into trouble because they’re too stupid to realize they’re following a madman.  Kirk’s “We reach” to conclude the episode is utterly false; he has been rude and belligerent to their point of view from the beginning of the episode, and I absolutely do not believe that he has come to understand them, or Spock’s interest in their goals.

  2. Kevin Black Avatar

    You’re definitely not the only person who feels this way about the episode. I think the show should be drawing dramatic contrasts between different characters’ belief systems, however. The test for me is not whether Kirk fully embraces the protestors, but whether the episode as a whole allows for a reasonably full and sympathetic expression of opposing belief systems. Viewers who agree with one side or the other should each be able to find something to make them happy. I thought the counterculture point of view was well supported in the dialogue between Chekov and Irina, and bolstered by the sympathy of Spock, who is the moral center of the crew.

    It’s a bit troubling that the protestors are depicted as falling under the sway of a malevolent leader–but this is hardly without historical referent. Charles Manson, anyone? I discuss this a little further on the comment thread at TheViewscreen, where I make the case why the episode is not a moral polemic against hippies.  Full disclosure, I may have been the only person on the thread supporting the episode:  http://www.theviewscreen.com/the-way-to-eden/

  3. R. Alex Reutter Avatar

    I absolutely agree that Kirk doesn’t have to embrace the protestors’ point of view; in fact he should not, but he is arrogant and condescending and then proven right, and then has the nerve to act like he understands them.  The average crewman seems to be more sympathetic to the hippies, and Kirk should be more enlightened than that.  How is this a balanced discussion of different views?

    Chekov and Irina’s dialogue is condescending to counterculture or misogynistic, and probably both.  Irina was training to be a science officer at Starfleet with Chekov, and yet she seems incapable of understanding his explanations of the basic tools of the trade.  How are we supposed to interpret this, other than that the writers have made her new beliefs, in collaboration with her uterus, shrivel her brain?  Ugh.

    I want to be consoled by Spock’s sympathy, but they fail to adequately explain the logic of his position.

Leave a Reply to Kevin Black Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *