2.3 — “The Changeling”

2.3 — “The Changeling”

Plot: Investigating the apparent death of 4 billion people in the Malurian system, the Enterprise encounters, and beams aboard, a strange being (ship? robot?) named Nomad, who mistakes Captain Kirk for his (its?) creator. Only this confusion stops Nomad from carrying out its mission–to sterilize all imperfect biologic lifeforms it encounters.

Thoughts: The Enterprise encounters a lot of all-powerful space douches in its travels (h/t www.TheViewscreen.com for the term), but this is the first time it encounters an all-powerful oversize thermos strapped to an aerosol can with a Napoleon complex. Joking aside, I like Nomad. I felt a thrill of excitement the moment it beamed on board. I love the unexpected, and it turns out that I remember TOS so poorly that basically everything is unexpected.

When Nomad starts talking about sterilizing all life, I realized that it’s like a Dalek. Could the mysterious Tan Ru be Davros?

The scenes in Sickbay with Uhura are quite affecting. And that thing killed Scotty! They really manage to build a sense of human cost into this episode. I don’t quite buy the business about re-educating Uhura from a blank, irreversibly emptied mind–the resolution of that plot point was just irresponsible and I’m not going to think very much about it. They should have explained that the task was to reawaken Uhura’s lost memories, or else just found a way to reverse the damage. I did like to see Nichelle Nichols work on a meatier acting challenge than usual, and she spoke Swahili, which she had to learn for the episode, quite convincingly. Also, any episode that has Uhura singing automatically earns an extra half point from me.

If I remember correctly, this is Spock’s third mind-meld of the series. Last time it was the Horta, this time a homicidal (genocidal?) machine. Something about the way Nimoy reaches out for the touch immediately elevates the scene to a higher plane.

I like this episode, and the concept of an intelligent machine–a Changeling–that is first sent away from Earth and comes back unforeseeably changed. They should make a movie out of this plot! (Oh, wait….) I like it despite the fact that you can clearly see the wire holding up Nomad on the Blu-ray remastered version of the episode. However….

Given that Nomad is both intelligent and recognizes Kirk as its master, it should have been possible to reprogram it, rather than cause it to destroy itself. I would think that explaining to Nomad the story of its own origin might be enough to correct the problem. If that seems too risky, just order it to receive new programming. I think Kirk and Nomad’s conversations could have benefited from a trained facilitator, skilled in both child psychology and Pascal (or whatever computer language Nomad was originally programmed in).

The benefits of preserving and harnessing the technology behind Nomad, rather than destroying it, are obvious. One thing that intermittently bugs me about Star Trek is that the crew seems very nonchalant about making discoveries that in real life would instantly change the course of history, make the careers of the whole crew, and provide for a lifetime of future study (The Guardian of Forever? The First Federation??). Instead, they shrug their shoulders and warp away to next week’s stupendous episode.

With the extra half-point for Uhura, 4 out of 5 first grade readers stored on magnetic tape.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Changeling_(Star_Trek:_The_Original_Series)


by

Tags:

Comments

12 responses to “2.3 — “The Changeling””

  1. Kevin Black Avatar

    I don’t know whether it should require spoiler warnings to state the obvious, since it is something of a reveal in the film, but “The Changeling” has essentially the same premise as Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979), which, according to Memory Alpha, some fans subtitle “Where Nomad Has Gone Before.” That film uses the Voyager probe, which was launched in 1977, so not available to the TOS writers in 1968.

  2. Bill Testerman Avatar

    I also like “The Changeling” a good deal. It’s an interesting premise. And usually I think it’s highly unlikely when Kirk talks a computer into committing suicide, like in “Return of the Archons.” However, this time it makes more sense because Nomad’s stated mission is to destroy anything that is imperfect, so Kirk just manages to turn that on Nomad itself.

    I agree with you that the idea of totally re-educating Uhura in one week is ludicrous. For one thing, if her memory was totally wiped clean, how could she already understand English and Swahili in that sickbay scene?? Also, if they’re so good at educating, why does Starfleet need an Academy? And how could her personality be the same afterward? Etc. etc.

    Perhaps you’re right that Kirk could have ordered Nomad to change its programming, but I wonder if it would have allowed that. Maybe Kirk could also have dealt with Nomad by tricking it back into the transporter, then dematerialize it, NOT rematerialize it again but hold it in storage in the transporter. Or dispersing it in space or some such. I believe they could use the transporter that way. 

    Director Marc Daniels said they had to build 3 different Nomads, 1 on a wire, 1 on a dolly, and 1 on the floor. For instance, he said they couldn’t get the one suspended by wire through a doorway, hence they’d use the dolly one then.

    I also give “The Changeling” 4 out of 5. I wonder if writer John Meredyth Lucas got any payment for the first ST movie?

  3. Kevin Black Avatar

    Good question about John M. Lucas! I guess we have to accept that Nomad’s encounter with the other satellite did not just garble its programming, but also left it insane, making it still highly unpredictable even after some of the garbling is deciphered/exposed.

  4. Bill Testerman Avatar

    Yeah, Nomad did seem quite insane! Maybe it would have accepted reprogramming before Kirk made the mistake of telling Nomad that he (Kirk) was also imperfect.

    I went on imdb.com, and for “Star Trek: The Motion Picture” it shows the writers to be Gene Roddenberry (“TV series Star Trek”), Alan Dean Foster (“story”), and Harold Livingston (“screenplay”). So it sounds like J.M. Lucas did not get any official credit for the original story and thus no money.

  5. Kevin Black Avatar

    Nomad is also interesting in terms of miniaturization–all that power and potential for death in such a small package. That’s part of what’s chilling about the episode. Although it’s not presented as a horror episode, it shares some of those characteristics, as did “Charlie X” (especially) and “What Are Little Girls Made Of?”

  6. R. Alex Reutter Avatar

    I feel like the ship shaking has become a lot more violent this season.  IIRC, the bridge just shuddered a little during “Balance of Terror”, now everyone is throwing themselves around.

    Veeger!  in a pint-sized package!

    Spock: “That is a woman.”

    Veeger/NOMAD: “A mass of conflicting impulses.”

    Kirk: [Imagined cut line]  “That is a woman.”

    There’s an odd/interesting shot from behind of NOMAD as they go to sick bay.

    Great job by Nichelle Nichols being “reeducated”, though we’re all agreed the resolution is ridiculous.

    Kirk: “Spock is going to touch you… you will permit it.”  I can’t get behind Spock mind melding a machine — hate, hate, hate this.

    Why did the redshirts fire at NOMAD?  Hasn’t Kirk briefed them that it’s invincible?

    Overall, I think this theme was improved upon in The Motion Picture.

  7. Kevin Black Avatar

    I can see the problem with mind-melding with a machine. But Nomad is alive, right? It may have started as just a computer or satellite, but it’s sentient now. Which begs the question, what does that even mean. But I would say that a large part of the power of this episode is watching Nomad be unsure of itself, and try to negotiate its confusion about not just a change in its programming, but a transition from one kind of existence to another.

    I almost watched The Motion Picture the other day, but then disciplined myself to take things in order.

  8. R. Alex Reutter Avatar

    The question of whether NOMAD is sentient, or even alive, is a very interesting question, and far from given.  I believe its actions and “thought” processes are those of a complex machine, not a sentient, but I also more strongly believe that Spock should only be able to mind meld with something that is at least alive, ideally sentient, and preferably organic — otherwise he could mind meld with, say, the ship’s computer.  By allowing Spock to mind meld with NOMAD, I believe the writers have answered the question of whether NOMAD is sentient for us, when it’s really a murky question whose answer should be left to the viewer to decide.  (That is, they’re “telling” rather than “showing”, which is unsatisfying.)

  9. Randi Cohen Avatar

    I am not a huge fan of this episode. Just felt like the plot was thin. Despite not having seen it before, I could basically predict what would happen. Very similar in my mind to devil in the dark, which also hinges on a mind meld to reveAl what was relatively obvious from the start. That said, nimoy and Nichols do an amazing job. And for some reason I liked the corny joke part at the end. Kirk as Jewish mother… That at least is unexpected!

    Rating: 2 out of 5 flying Scotsmen.

  10. Bill Testerman Avatar

    Has it ever been established, or at least up to the point of “The Changeling,” that Vulcans can’t mind-meld with a machine? I don’t recall that it has.

  11. R. Alex Reutter Avatar

    BTW, I noticed during “I, Mudd” that Spock attempted to mind meld with the android after the Enterprise was taken over.  It may be their intention for Vulcans to mind-meld with machines, but that seems highly illogical, at least from a storytelling perspective.  It’s too far-reaching a power.  You would think it would then be Spock’s preferred method for interfacing with the ship’s computer.  Why feed it punch cards when you can simply tell it what you want?

  12. Kevin Black Avatar

    Again like Nomad, it seems the androids in “I, Mudd” have evolved into a form of consciousness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *