2.2 — “Who Mourns for Adonais?”

2.2 — “Who Mourns for Adonais?”

Plot: On a reconnaissance mission to Pollux V, the Enterprise is immobilized in the grip of a giant, human hand. Kirk and a landing party are commanded to beam down to the surface by an alien being who claims to be the Greek god, Apollo. Time to gather laurel leaves, light the ancient fires, and kill a sacrificial deer!

Thoughts: Some things seem cheap about this episode, and make it stop short from being great. The cramped studio sets seem like a paltry effort, and there’s a certain lack of variety–no B plot and few significant revelations or plot developments after the landing party initially beams down to the planet. A sense of spinning wheels sets in, and you feel the budgetary restraints restricting the number of cast members depicted and their range of movement. At the same time, this episode is kind of great in spite of itself.

The title comes from a line from Percy Bysse Shelley’s poem, “Adonais: An Elegy on the Death of John Keats.” (I almost remembered this all by myself from my days as an English major, but until I looked it up I was vague about the details.) There’s a good bit of lyricism and profundity to be found in the script. Turning away from the old gods is like the abandonment of childish things. I thought about this a lot as a kid (primed by seeing reruns of this episode?). I wrote a short story in high school about poor, forgotten Charon poling his way along the banks of the Styx. Back in the day I was more than capable of crying for my old toys, because I didn’t play with them much anymore. (I got over this, however–the sentimentality of the Toy Story movies doesn’t do much now for me now.)

So, yeah, this episode gets me. Michael Forest’s Apollo, vainly thrusting his hands to the heavens, tears streaking down his face and pooling under his chin? Moved. Apollo: “I would have loved you as a father loves his children.” Got me with that line. McCoy: “I wish we hadn’t had to do that.” Got me again. Apollo: “She stood in front of the temple and spread herself upon the wind, thinner and thinner, until only the wind remained.” That’s freakin’ beautiful. Liked the thunderstorm effects with the stage lights and wind machines. The fact that it doesn’t look quite real adds to the poignancy, somehow.

The easy knock on this episode is that it’s sexist–i.e., not so flattering in its depiction of Lt. Carolyn Palamas. I know but…. In 1968, women leaving careers to start families was a real thing. Kirk and McCoy comment on this, but don’t imply that it makes Palamas less of a valuable crew member. She falls for Apollo very fast, despite the coercive circumstances–because he gives her a pretty dress. Okay, that’s pretty bad. Can we just think of this as a mind-control glamour? I could twist things argue that “Who Mourns for Adonais?” is a critique of the patriarchy, which thoughtlessly elevates work and duty over art, leisure, and generative pleasures. I hate to be an apologist; I guess I don’t want to not accept the beauty that exists in this episode by rejecting it out of hand for its cultural myopia. Your mileage may vary.

I liked Chekhov less in this episode than in “Amok Time.” He seems to be there to provide daffy comic relief. When you’ve got a guy wearing gold lame pretending to be Apollo on an obvious sound stage with Doric columns, comic relief may not be what you need.

I like that the remastered effects show the Enterprise being held by a giant, glowing green hand. That’s Apollo’s secret! He’s a member of the Green Lantern Corps!

2.5 out of 5 poor, forgotten deities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Mourns_for_Adonais%3F


by

Tags:

Comments

14 responses to “2.2 — “Who Mourns for Adonais?””

  1. Kevin Black Avatar

    What if the Greek gods were alien beings with superior technology indistinguishable from magic by pre-industrial civilizations? I think that’s a science fiction premise.

  2. Kevin Black Avatar

    Fair enough! Don’t get me started about “Shore Leave.” 🙂

  3. Randi Cohen Avatar

    I liked it, personally.  The dialogue was beautiful and writers were clearly having fun.  Bloodthirsty Saracens, stubborn thistleheads (?), and what is the fuzzy animal Chekhov was about to list?  I thought the acting of the guy playing Apollo and the women in this episode was excellent.  

    And yes, there is sexism here, sure, but Scotty and Apollo act at least as hormone-driven as Lt. Palamas, and I love that this plot is similar in some ways to Space Seed but in this one, Lt. Palamas always puts her duty first.  Frankly, I think it was less the dress and more the sight of Apollo in that skimpy tunic that turned her head.  Plus there’s a certain charm in the emotional openness he displays.  Also, Lt. Uhura is bad-ass remodeling circuit boards and Spock gets a chance to redeem himself as Captain by actually coming up with useful ideas and not doing a bad job of motivating the crew either.  

    I do agree the staging is cramped and the plot a bit slow, but love that there are some big ideas in this episode.  I think Apollo has a point about forgetting the important things and that it’s not clear that all this space voyaging is actually qualitatively better than shepherding (whose value system would we use to judge that anyhow?).  I do wish that rather than simply appeal to xenophobia to convince Lt. Palamas to reject Apollo, Kirk had mentioned all the 450-odd lives at stake – crewmen who would never again see their families or have their independence and freedom to make their own meaning in their lives, that freedom is something our species values above comfort and security and has for thousands of years, and also that real love means wanting another person to be better according to their own vision of who they want to be, not trying to fit them into a cookie-cutter mold you’ve made up in your own mind about a perfect future.  Apollo in this way reminds me of an overgrown adolescent.  

    To me, this is a quintessential episode of Trek… not my favorite, but I think it’s very good. 

    My rating: 4 out of 5 disintegrating Parthenons.

  4. Bill Testerman Avatar

    I’m similar to most of you in that I like a lot about this episode, but some aspects of it have always bothered me too. However, I’ve always thought it looked good, even though Apollo’s temple was on a soundstage. The remastered effects help a lot, especially Apollo’s hand holding the Enterprise, which looks a lot more realistic now.

    Also, Michael Forest really seems like Apollo, doesn’t he? (I saw an interview with him about 10 years ago where he said one time in Italy he was accosted on the street as “Apollo.”) And some lines are beautifully written, like Kirk’s speech to Palamas, which to me suggests her duty to other crew members. Good point, Kevin, that the episode needs a B plot or new revelations, since after the intro you could largely guess what’s going to happen. Some points that bug me –  

    1)Why does Apollo talk like he really IS a god? I could believe that he and his pals might pretend that they’re gods with their advanced technology, but clearly Apollo has let that go to his head.

    2)At the end, where does Apollo GO? His “death” seems supernatural, but what really happens to him? Also, since Spock destroyed his source of power, how does he continue to do amazing things?

    3)Connected to #2, before Apollo “dies” he bemoans the fact that humans no longer care about the gods, but what about all the other humanoids in our galaxy? Surely some would be ripe for beings like Apollo. He could have been there already, instead of hanging around his temple. 

    4)Kirk saying (this is not an exact quote) “We no longer have any use for gods. We find the one quite sufficient.” Since Gene Roddenberry was a secular humanist, I’m surprised he let this slip through, unless NBC made them add Kirk’s second statement.

    5)I never bought that Lt. Palamas, who went through all that starship training, would just throw it all way for a petty dictator. Is she THAT fickle? (Good point, Randi, that several people there have raging hormones!) But at least Kirk’s speech makes her finally come to her senses.

    Yet despite some of these questions, it’s an interesting and effective episode. I give it 3.5 out of 5.

  5. R. Alex Reutter Avatar

    This one falls under the category of “crew detained by impossibly powerful opponent”, like in “The Corbomite Maneuver” and “The Squire of Gothos”.  I like that all three offer different solutions, and think I actually liked this one best of the three.

    There might be no subplot, but I think this allows for more ensemble acting — Uhura gets to do some engineering and has a good exchange with Spock**, Scotty is lovelorn, Sulu has a few lines, and Chekov, in only his second episode, has a more meaningful impact upon the solution to their problems than Uhura and Sulu had in the entire first season (and yes, I feel really bad for Nichols and Takei now).

    Kudos to casting for finding Forest, who rocks the tunic look while also being a capable actor, saving his best for the exit.  I could wish for better from the script for Palamas (really?  a pretty dress?  gack***), but I actually find Apollo’s attempts to woo her, and her positive response, more believable than most of the other romances.  You feel Apollo’s loneliness, and his bitterness and wrath is that of a father who was expecting to be greeted with the hero worship that a toddler bestows on their parents, but instead is poorly-equipped to face a sullen and irascible teenager who has outgrown their parents (and yes, Kirk’s explosive reaction is that of the teenager here).  

    ** the more I see of TOS, the more impressed I am with the nuTrek decision to have a romance between Uhura and Spock.  You could definitely interpret a spark between them in the few scenes they’ve had together.

    * I could also do without them questioning her loyalty; after all, she interfered in their first attempt largely because they hadn’t told her the plan!  (granted, they didn’t have the opportunity, but Kirk’s attitude…)

  6. Kevin Black Avatar

    Good discussion! A couple of trivia notes: 1) According to the Internet, the original script ended with the revelation that Palamas is carrying Apollo’s child. This got nixed by the network, but is still present in the Blish adaptation.  2) Michael Forest reprised the role of Apollo in 2013 in “Pilgrim of Eternity,” the first episode of the web series Star Trek Continues.  http://www.startrekcontinues.com  Haven’t had a chance to watch the whole thing yet, but the opening minutes are impressive.

  7. Bill Testerman Avatar

    Thanks for the link to “Star Trek Continues,” which I had not heard about. I just watched the Apollo sequel on there entitled “Pilgrim of Eternity,” which I found to be a worthwhile sequel with several interesting ideas. And considering that it’s a fan project it’s amazingly well done! Partly, they tried to answer some questions I posed in my comments above, like, since Kirk and crew were not receptive to Apollo, why didn’t he and the other “gods” go to some less developed planet of humanoids?

    As far as “Who Mourns for Adonais” is concerned, it would have made sense for Palamas to be pregnant afterward. I’m surprised that NBC allowed the suggested rape scene to be left in. And I agree with R. Alex that Kirk’s anger toward Apollo was excessive considering the powerless condition they were in. Not to mention Scotty’s attacks on him, which were even more absurd! (By the way, I thought that scene where Apollo zapped Scotty and sent him hurtling backward was well done. I read that a stunt guy had a harness attached to him, and was yanked backward. Effective.)

  8. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Wow.  Love that Chris Doohan (James Doohan’s son) is playing Montgomery Scott.  Apparently he wanted to play him on Star Trek: Into Darkness but did not get the part.

    Amazingly well done indeed!  Will finish later but definitely worth watching!

  9. Bill Testerman Avatar

    Sounds interesting, Audrey! Are you going to attempt to publish them, or post them to the Internet? I’d like to read them.

  10. Bill Testerman Avatar

    Maybe try to sell them to the company that publishes Star Trek books. But yeah, that’s a disadvantage to writing ST stories. If that one company doesn’t buy it you’ve got nowhere else  to go!

  11. Kevin Black Avatar

    I have a review copy of These Are the Voyages: TOS Season 2 by Marc Cushman. True to form, the book is 688 pages and has 23 pages just on the making of this episode. It talks about the altered ending:

         One bridge sequence planned for this day was not filmed — the episode’s “tag scene.” Writer Gilbert Ralston had been daring in that he ended the story with the discovery that Carolyn Palamas, after her time alone with Apollo on the planet, was now pregnant. The creative staff loved this idea and kept it in the script. NBC’s Jean Messerschmidt was trying to be cooperative with the Star Trek producers; she knew how vital the plot point was. But, as production neared, word of the controversial subject matter began to spread to other departments beyond that of Broadcast Standards.

         “The network absolutely would not allow that,” Dorothy Fontana said. “Oh my God, intercourse outside marriage! Usually we could sneak by a lot of stuff, [but] it was ultimately stricken.”

  12. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Maybe they should have just had them get married, if that was the objection?

  13. R. Alex Reutter Avatar

    Typically when mortal women are impregnated by their gods, they don’t get to marry them… though I think your point is still valid, Randi.  Apollo could easily have made a short ritual that would be interpreted by the crew as roughly equivalent to a human marriage ceremony.

  14. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Hahaha!  I am actually not sure that one would pass the censors today!  (Unless it were transparently a farce).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *