7.8 — “Attached”

7.8 — “Attached”

Plot: Picard and Crusher are abducted by transporter capture and fitted with transponders that force them to stay close together and enable them to read each others’ thoughts and feelings. Riker’s attempts to retrieve them force him to get embroiled in a hundred-year planetary cold war.

Thoughts: I want to resist applying my critical brain to this one. I appreciate an original story full of life and adventure. And a campfire, which makes me think of Star Trek V. I was touched by Picard’s gentle reaction to Crusher’s “I didn’t know you felt that way.” Picard: “Didn’t you?” If only TNG were always this fun to watch.

“Attached” is designed to pay off long-standing loose ends regarding the supposed attraction between Jean Luc and Beverly that go back to “Encounter at Farpoint.” It does so remarkably well. A central mystery of their relationship is, if these two are so hot for each other, why is their relationship characterized by stasis and inertia? Which leads to two questions that do not have right answers. Is the resolution they reach in their final meeting in Picard’s quarters persuasive? Is it satisfying?

There is natural frustration, as a fan, that these characters are not giving in to what we think we want. Which is, I suppose, a full-throated declaration of love, a release, and catharsis. A few moments of beaming happiness. A declaration that they will never be lonely again.

This is fiction, after all. We put ourselves mentally inside the characters. As I write this, Meryl Streep just told an audience at the Golden Globes, “An actor’s only job is to enter the lives of people who are different from us and let you feel what that feels like.” In the privacy of your mind, it’s natural to reach for the catharsis.

But if another task of art is to hold up a mirror to life, we must be honest and say that this outcome is not unexpected, or uncommon.

In television, it’s the frisson that keeps us coming back. That crackle of potential, so alive to possibility, to unspoken shared truths on the verge of being uttered. Perhaps Crusher is not ready to give up the joy she gets from the frisson. Maybe she intuitively realizes that it’s the best part of her relationship with Picard. So why part with it? You’ve reached a certain age, you see things not working out, so why not skip all that. Frisson is evergreen.

More likely she doesn’t accept Picard’s framing or share his reality. For all his over-intellectualized sentimentality and sweet solicitude, declaimed sonorously, it’s a shoe that doesn’t fit. I like you for coffee and croissants, Jean Luc, but I don’t like you that way.

Or maybe she’s a coward. Bob Dylan would screech like a rusty hinge singing dirges about his disappointment. I once, about 16 years ago, added his song “Is Your Love in Vain?” from Street Legal (1978) to a broken-hearted mix tape (one of my last). “Are you willing to risk it all, Or is your love in vain?” It’s a great song. She did come off as a reckless romantic during the affair with the Trill, but that was with a new face.

Either way, I think we have to respect her choices.

4 out of 5–okay, what is that equipment the Kes fill their quarters with? 4 out of 5 Tesla coils and spinny objects that are somehow crucial to their planetary security. That scene is pretty funny. Jonathan Frakes did a good job directing this one.

http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Attached


by

Tags:

Comments

9 responses to “7.8 — “Attached””

  1. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Meh. I did like the acting here, which I rarely enjoy in general from Gates or Patrick (I find both too stiff but they weren’t here).

    The plot was ridiculous of course (no explanation of why a planet of mind readers would be so paranoid, nor why the Kes would suddenly turn on the federation randomly).

    The flirtation was sweet but the ending seemed to me to be simply a plot convenience. I think we are owed a bit more explanation than that for Bev’s rejection of Picard, if we are being asked to think otherwise.

    My best guess is that perhaps Beverly is afraid of screwing up their relationship… the stakes are high after all. But she could have said this, out of decency to Picard and the viewer.

  2. Kevin Black Avatar

    Well, it seems the Kes turned on the Federation because they are extremely paranoid, which is the same reason why they can’t get along with the Prytt. I would agree that it strains credulity that the Federation would have been even considering admitting them at this stage in the first place. In a way, this odd, thinly sketched planetary détente is reminiscent of some of the half-baked stories from TNG’s early seasons. I thought it basically worked here because, as a B story, it wasn’t carrying a lot of water for the episode, which is mainly about Picard and Crusher and their relationship. Also they at least have a sense of humor about it.

  3. Kevin Black Avatar

    The basic political situation also reminded me of “A Taste of Armageddon,” which was definitely not my favorite episode from TOS, but other people seem to like it.

  4. Randi Cohen Avatar

    OMG look at the title comparison between the two episodes… really. TNG is just phoning those in. I actually think the titles make a big difference to the felt quality/uniqueness/resonance of each episode.

    And yes, I get that apparently the Kes are super-paranoid, but they read minds, right?? And surely they can read at least the minds of Picard and Beverly… so what are they so concerned about? Also they are not just paranoid, they’re also apparently very silly and inconsistent about how they express it. But sure, I’ll grant you it provided some entertaining scenes. I just get more annoyed at psychobabble than technobabble, because making a psychologically self-consistent plot is relatively easy whereas of course you won’t be able to perfectly justify the scientific part of how this future stuff works. So it just seems like lack of effort on the part of the writers when the psychology is off.

  5. Kevin Black Avatar

    Totally agree that “Attached” is a new low in a string of totally undistinguished episode titles that well exemplify the difference in seriousness and literary quality between TOS and TNG.

  6. Kevin Black Avatar

    I agree it would be nice to get more explanation from Crusher, but in life in my experience the instincts come first and the explanations are often devised later, if at all. It would always be nice when a relationship fails to form or falls apart to have nicely formed explanations, so both parties can say “I regret this, but there you are.” Maybe we should expect they’ve figured that by the 24th century, with faster than light travel. But while a pat explanation might feel more satisfying as a fan (or seems like it would?), this feels true to life.

    Of course, two people who care about each other starting a new relationship together is also true to life, but then the show wouldn’t have reset at the end of the hour, for the convenience of franchising and the impending movie series. So plot convenience surely plays a role.

  7. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Interesting point! It helps me respect the episode slightly more… But still it feels off to me to end with a sentence what has built up indirectly for seasons and directly for a whole episode. At least there could be more ambivalence shown or a longer emotional process to get to “no”…

  8. sunny jim Avatar

    Aw, you didn’t mention the fireswamps, or the possibility of lightning sands or R.O.U.S’s!

  9. Kevin Black Avatar

    I had that written down, but at the point where I had written 300 words already….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *