7.1 — “Descent, Part II”

7.1 — “Descent, Part II”

Plot: Trapped by Lore, his Borg collaborators, and the radio-controlled Data, Picard, Geordi and Troi must figure out a way to escape before Data’s cybernetic experiments prove fatal for Geordi. Meanwhile, Crusher commands the ship through a firefight with a Borg vessel.

Thoughts: This is another episode in which the second part, written by René Echevarria, fails to live up to the first part, written by Ronald D. Moore based on a story by Jeri Taylor. Maybe it’s a case of Echevarria being painted into a corner by his colleagues, but I think it’s fair to blame him for the lazy reliance on technobabble to avoid almost every part of the story which promises to be interesting.

Data’s dark and disturbing emotional awakening? Well, it’s a carrier wave broadcast from Dr. Soong’s emotion chip coupled with disabling Data’s ethical program, which can be rebooted by a phased kedion pulse at the right frequency. Are you wondering how this explains the events of Part One, in which Data experiences emotions on the Enterprise and space station, light years away from Lore’s lair? Don’t, because the authors of that seemingly promising story have left the building.

The redemption of Data could have involved reason, debate, and explorations of ethics and artificial intelligence, but no, Picard is able to broadcast a kedion pulse by reconfiguring a Borg transceiver, so no drama is necessary. Similarly, the tactical situation for Crusher and the enemy starship could have been an opportunity for a classic Trek space battle. This would have required the writer to imagine who is commanding the other ship, and what his or her objectives and motivations are. But why do that when you can just have the ship direct a high-energy particle beam to produce a superfluid gas eruption and erase the problem with a few lines of scribbled nonsense?

Hugh recognized Locutus in “I, Borg,” but none of the other Borg recognize him now, nor does Picard react to being back among the drones, or to the change in Borg psychology. The writer even forgets that Worf and Riker haven’t heard about Lore’s presence yet, because they don’t react when Hugh mentions his name. I did enjoy Hugh’s brief scene–we could have used much more of that, and the plight of the Borg in general. I can’t help but think that a serious science fiction writer of the caliber that Trek used to hire as freelancers could have done more with the premise.

While technobabble continues to be used as a crutch to resolve conflict and wrap up half-baked stories, I will write more negative reviews. I did like some aspects of the episode. While Lore’s whole motivation is underexplained (I take it he wants to wipe out all life that isn’t artificial? Or is he just trying to distract the Borg’s attention with this objective?) Brent Spiner makes a chilling villain in the dual role of Data and Lore. I like a good mad scientist story. They should have just brought it back around to a serious examination of Data’s psychology as an artificial being vulnerable to this kind of manipulation. It feels like Echevarria doesn’t really believe the premise, or doesn’t feel he has the time to go into it, so he tries to hand wave the changes in Data away, instead of explaining and exploring them.

The art department continues to excel. Goval the rebel Borg looks great. And I got a thrill out of seeing Data preserve the emotion chip, so it can make its reappearance in Star Trek: Generations, which was already in the scripting process behind the scenes.

2 of 5 perfectly aimed and instantly fatal superfluid gas eruptions.

http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Descent,_Part_II


by

Tags:

Comments

8 responses to “7.1 — “Descent, Part II””

  1. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Yeah. Not the best, as far as how many opportunities are passed up here.

    Some good parts: continuity of technobabble (“multiphasic shielding” returns!), Bev finally gets a turn at the helm and to be called “sir” (I’ll ignore her totally unprofessional hairdo), a young black female is portrayed as smart and competent (unfortunately not a common enough sight on TV that one ought to let it go unnoticed), Hugh (only agent in the plot who really explores ideas about the human condition). Geordi’s compassion for Data in the context of his own torture and imminent death was moving.

    YES, I have no idea how they could pass on exploring how DANGEROUS Data is given his vulnerability to having his ethics subroutine disengaged. Given that ethics also have at least part of their basis in logic, it’s also not clear how possible that actually would be.

    Also, how much worse of a Counselor could Deanna possibly be?? Just for the record, anger is basically always secondary to another feeling, typically feeling hurt or threatened in some way. It would have been helpful for her to enlighten him about that, and also that ethics are at least in part how we determine whether or not to obey the urges that our feelings create. And that anger provides a temporary increase in strength/resolve at the cost of cognitive flexibility, so it can be a dangerous emotion in that it tends to limit options.

    Also, is Data addicted to feelings? I don’t personally feel addicted to mine.

    I don’t know, the whole thing could have been done so much better. I do think that abrupt onset of individuality and the need to cope with that are fascinating topics and I’d love to have seen them further explored.

    Agree, Brent Spiner is great, as usual. It doesn’t bother me that Lore had no explicit motivation, I see him as just a textbook narcissist who wants power/adulation/all the toys, so this was probably just a way for him to get that.

  2. Kevin Black Avatar

    Yes, it seems way too easy to disable the ethical circuit, which I take it functions like Asimov’s robot laws. Are we to infer that this is how Data always feels underneath, but it is suppressed by the ethical circuit? Does it bother anyone that his “feelings” of friendship and camaraderie are assumed for the sake of convenience? What does it mean to be sentient without feelings, anyway? So many missed opportunities.

  3. Kevin Black Avatar

    The default for the writers seems to be too treat Data as if he has feelings, but isn’t aware of them. This pose doesn’t work here.

  4. Kevin Black Avatar

    Addicted to feelings, also undeveloped. You can get addicted to endorphin releases from, say, scratch tickets, video games, or pharmaceuticals, but I guess that’s a different thing.

  5. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Yes. Isn’t the desire to have feelings of itself a feeling? What motivates Data’s actions at all (beyond blindly following orders) if not feelings? Data having no feelings never made sense to me.

  6. Kevin Black Avatar

    He could say that his programming prevents him from having strong feelings. He seems to have an instinct for self preservation. Wasn’t there an episode where he was upset to learn about his own mortality, or immortality? Was that “Time’s Arrow?” Could you program an unfeeling machine to prefer his own survival and thriving/success according to a defined series of metrics, and thereby simulate feelings?

  7. Randi Cohen Avatar

    At what point does the simulation lose distinction from the reality? Feelings are really a set of physiological changes prompted by a stimulus. These chages are in part physically felt and they activate neural pathways related to a similar brain state in the past, generating thoughts and urges that are related. They are to some degree self-perpetuating, particularly if acted upon, in that then they are reinforced and are felt more strongly the next time they are prompted. It’s really not that mysterious or difficult if you can make a machine to do everything else that Data does, or so it seems to me.

  8. Kevin Black Avatar

    So here we have an unparalleled opportunity to comment on the human condition, but the opportunity is constantly avoided, at least since Melinda Snodgrass (“The Measure of a Man”) left the writing staff. TOS always lionized intuition and feeling; Data could be used to examine how it’s overrated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *