5.17 — “The Outcast”

5.17 — “The Outcast”

Plot: Circumstances involving a rescue mission into “null space” cause Riker to work closely with Soren, a gifted pilot from an androgynous race called the J’naii. Soren’s identification as female is branded as perversion among her people, and exposes her to the threat of psychotectic therapy.

Thoughts: Just when I was starting to despair over the quality of recent fifth season episodes. There isn’t much action, and the story centers on Will Riker’s love life. But I like it!

I paused the episode at one point to write on my pad that Jonathan Frakes is doing a good acting job. I froze right on a smirk. Oh well, but the performance we get from him is subtle and layered. The guest star, Melinda Culea, is fantastic and has good chemistry with Frakes.

Riker has a tough ending that reminds me of some of the hard knocks that Kirk took at the end of episodes like “The City on the Edge of Forever.” “The Paradise Syndrome,” and even “Dagger of the Mind.” Is Soren the one that he will never recover from? 

And what was going on with Soren in her last scene? Did they start the “therapy” early, and it worked very fast? Or is she lying to Will? If the therapy is not just a cruel sham, like gay reparation therapy is in real life, is there a chance that she is better off? 

It’s the chance of shows like this that makes watching the series worthwhile.

The discussion of gender, including pronoun problems, in 1992 seems ahead of its time. Soren’s story about how her identity makes her an outcast in her own society is metaphorically about 20th century attitudes towards homosexuality. There are dueling quotes from Rick Berman and Jonathan Frakes on IMDB and Memory Alpha indicating there was some discussion about whether the actor cast to play Soren should have been a man or a woman (they cast women to play all the J’naii roles). I don’t fault their choices, but If Soren had been played by a man, this episode would have joined “Plato’s Stepchildren” in the annals of historic television broadcasts, and would be a good deal more famous today.

As it is, very few episodes in the 725-episode Star Trek canon touch on homosexuality, even indirectly, as I would argue happened in “A Private Little War,” “Mudd’s Passion,” and TNG’s “The Host.” “What Are LIttle Girls Made Of?” was an episode that examined fluidity of identity and sex, but not gender specifically. I understand the topic of homosexuality will be raised a couple more times in forthcoming episodes of DS9 and ENT. Perhaps this will become a more visible part of the future when the new Trek series premieres in 2017.

If the episode wasn’t as strong, I would spend more time carping about the ridiculous concept of “null space”–technobabble at its worst.

4 out of 5 strong interests in exobotany.

http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/The_Outcast


by

Tags:

Comments

2 responses to “5.17 — “The Outcast””

  1. Walter Phippeny Avatar

    Trekspertise​ has a great short piece about homosexuality in Star Trek and how the writers try to get into the subject, only to be cut off at the knees by the producers. In this perfect image of a tolerant and accepting society, homosexuality is strangely absent or brought up through veiled sci-fi standins, like the J’naii — we know we’re in sci-fi name territory when there’s a superfluous apostrophe in there — and we haven’t seen to date a same sex couple; though we almost had one in the background of the episode with Data’s daughter. It was filmed and then cut, I think. Hopefully, the new series will have better representation. I just hope that any gay characters that might appear will be fully fleshed out, and not just a collection of gay tropes and clichés.

  2. Randi Cohen Avatar

    I think the impassioned speech that Soren gives at her hearing is worth the hour of watching, but other than that I felt this was kind of a “meh” episode.  I had a hard time buying that Frakes was that into Soren (he is attracted to so many women… what would make him/her any different?).

    It was nice of Riker to try to “save” her by lying, and it is also a really interesting question about whether the fact that the “reparative therapy” in this culture really works (maybe?) affects the parallel between this culture and our own in any significant way.  Changing who a person is attracted to feels uncomfortably like brainwashing to me (as I would guess it was intended to).  So I would say the parallel still holds.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *