3.16 — “The Offspring”

3.16 — “The Offspring”

Plot: Data surprises everyone by creating a new android named Lal, whom he refers to as his child. He has discovered a technique to create a positronic brain by transferring his own neural pathways, the first success at this endeavor since Dr. Soong’s work on Data himself. Data enlists Guinan to help him “raise” Lal by teaching her how to interact with humans, and discovers she is a precocious emotional learner. Meanwhile, Admiral Haftel from the Starfleet research division tries to order Data to surrender Lal for research purposes.

Thoughts: There is a lot going on in this episode.

The story of Data’s creation of Lal is fascinating. I find Data’s invitation to Lal to define her own gender and appearance to be very progressive, and timely, with identity politics currently bubbling to the fore. For androids, at least, we can agree that racial and gender identity is a construct, and that it is imperative to honor the individual’s feelings on the matter. Trek hasn’t always been great about sexual politics–see my forthcoming separate discussion post. 

The story of Lal’s experience of social isolation and her grief at parting from Data are highly relatable, thanks to a remarkable performance by Hallie Todd. Denise Okuda, the Trek expert extraordinaire who oversaw the remastering of TOS and TNG for Blu-ray release with her husband Mike Okuda, reveals in the Blu-ray commentary that “The Offspring” is one of her favorite TNG episodes, and one of only two that ever brought a tear to her eye, based of the power of Lal’s personal story and the sensitivity with which it was portrayed.

The business with the Admiral, however, makes much less sense. Didn’t we just settle in TNG 2.9 “The Measure of a Man” that androids are legally persons, not property? If Data is so, then Lal is also (she hasn’t even enlisted in Starfleet). The Admiral’s demands are illogical anyway. Surely Data’s ability to reproduce positronic brains is a more revolutionary and interesting to Starfleet than Lal herself, who is just Data’s first progeny. Why they would be so interested in her and not in this knowledge is bewildering. If they really want Lal to grow up in a research facility, why not just transfer Data to the facility? Starfleet actually has the right to do this (provided Data does not resign), and it is apparent that no matter how good a third officer he is, Data’s most valuable service to Starfleet may be as a scientist. What advantage is gained by separating them? Is it so they deactivate and dissect Lal without Data’s knowledge? Why not just do that to Data? Oh right, because  of”The Measure of a Man”–and we’re going around in circles.

The Admiral storyline is a “The Measure of a Man” retread, although the themes are arguably presented more viscerally and in less of an intellectual, detached fashion. A better episode would have acknowledged the precedent set in the previous episode and pushed the idea to a new place. Maybe elements in Starfleet are prepared to set aside the legal niceties for illicit gain. If not Starfleet, perhaps a Harry Mudd-style third party could have materialized? 

I’m not sure that Lal qualifies as Data’s child, and not an invention, if she does not carry forward Data’s genetic material. Perhaps their brains are related? This episode could have easily gone in a more Frankenstein direction. The idea of Data creating life, in his spare time, without knowing how it will develop, is creepy and scary. It’s scary just to think of Data, with his incredible abilities, having hobbies, especially secret ones. He does not understand human norms, after all. Has anyone else seen Ex Machina (2015)? (I highly recommend it.) This can go badly.

When Data tells the bridge crew that he has incorporated Lal’s programs and memories into his own programming, does that include assimilating her experience of emotion? Does this have the potential to drive Data insane, as it did to Lal? Would he tell anyone? We have learned that Data is capable of concealing information. After his experience in this episode, he might rationally conclude that he is better off keeping his continuing experiments, or personal emotional/perceptual awakenings, to himself. Data is not human, and not necessarily harmless. Picard might wake up one day to find out he has created a superhuman robot army. I’m flashing back to TOS 1.7 “What Are Little Girls Made Of?,” an unsung highlight of TOS and a personal favorite. In that episode, the true tragedy of Dr. Corby is that, after the shift in consciousness he experiences while placing his brain in an android body, he doesn’t realize that he is now insane.

Two facts from Wikipedia demand inclusion here. First, this is the first Star Trek episode directed by Jonathan Frakes, and his first directing credit of any kind. Frakes would go on to direct seven more episodes of TNG, Star Trek: First Contact (1996), Star Trek: Insurrection (1998), and three episodes each of DS9 and VOY. Patrick Stewart, LeVar Burton, Michael Dorn, and Gates McFadden would later follow in his footsteps, although Frakes has had the most prolific post-Trek directing career.

Second, this episode is the source of the famous Picard double facepalm meme: http://www.quickmeme.com/Picard-Double-Facepalm

3.5 of 5 inexplicably green Andorians.

http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/The_Offspring


by

Tags:

Comments

4 responses to “3.16 — “The Offspring””

  1. Walter Phippeny Avatar

    Kevin Black You make a very good point about Data conducting secret experiments. I had never really thought about it like that before, but, now, I’m retroactively creeped out.

    I guess we never think of Data as dangerous because Spiner put a lot of effort into making the character seem innocent. Data goes out of his way to help people, often at personal risk. Lore is evil because he has emotions, but Data is good because he doesn’t? Do we ever really get into why Data is so motivated to become human?

    As you said, it’s important to keep in mind that Data isn’t human. This is very easy to forget. And the film Ex Machina also makes the point that no AI that could pass the Turing Test would do so willingly, meaning that part of being an AI would be the ability to deceive, read people, and do what is necessary for survival. This episode is by far better than “The Measure of a Man,” but they did miss an opportunity here to take the discussion further instead of just throwing in Admiral “Evil Bureaucrat” who brings some drama to the table by threatening to split apart parent and child. Yeah, that guy is just there to turn the crank on the plot and add some suspense. Do we ever think that he’s going to succeed in doing something that is obviously evil?

    I am a little disappointed that the decided to make Lal a one off character, but I do appreciate how she occasionally resurfaces like in TNG 7.10 Inheritance and brings some gravitas to Data’s story line. 

  2. Kevin Black Avatar

    Data is such a boy scout that he can’t wait to share his work with his friends, he just wants to wait until the work is finished. But at some point there has to be a loss of innocence…. You can imagine how Data would likely be written today as a post-Whedon character: deep backstory, hidden secret, dramatic turn that changes him forever and makes him into the big bad for Season Five. I’m not saying that would be a better version of the show. But if there is some danger that Data could turn into Lore, say, if he ever succeeded in awakening his emotions (which he actually has all along, right?), it would be nice to explore that a little.

  3. Randi Cohen Avatar

    I like Data innocent. It is really interesting that he seems capable of a sense of responsibility and loyalty to Lal as well as curiosity and interest but not love or grief.. Not sure why the latter qualify as emotions but not the former?

    Also the stuff about how a person without gender is incomplete actually seems pretty unenlightened today although I doubt anyone at the time would have noticed.

    Total respect for whoopi goldberg regarding degendering that line about love.

    Agree the whole plotline about the admiral was a retread and that the actress who played Lal was great. She managed to look a great deal like Brent spiner at times. I wonder if she studied his performances.

    I find it interesting and maybe a little cowardly how ardently the topic of Android rights is championed yet how little is done regarding women’s or lgbt issues on the show. It’s no TOS in that regard. I do like Lal’s questions about purpose though, I wish any of us really knew those answers!

  4. R. Alex Reutter Avatar

    …or, “Measure of a Man, Part II”

    Data builds an android child.  I’m always leery of episodes in which new characters are introduced who, going forward, would be a major part of the life of one of the “regular” cast.  Those characters always get whacked.

    Picard sounds concerned and annoyed by Data’s project — thankfully, Data gives the perfect answer, and thankfully, Deanna backs him up.  And, Picard tries to explain his concerns about what Starfleet would do with this technology if they got their hands on it; sadly, unsuccessfully.  I suppose that’s because they want to draw it out over the course of the episode.

    Lal’s initial look is intriguing.  I like how Lal begins in full android mode and gets to choose a gender identity.

    I really like Lal allowing the liquid to spill out of her mouth during the training sequence.  That was the best.

    I like the glimpse into Lal’s struggles at school.

    I like Dr. Crusher’s laugh at being called a “successful parent”.  Know the feeling.  This is a great scene.

    I don’t understand Starfleet’s position on this.  Didn’t we give Data full rights in “Measure of a Man”?  I’m not in favor of Starfleet’s Child Protective Services division.  There’s no basis for this part of the plot.

    I did not realize that Data was entirely incapable of using contractions.  That is… unsettling.  The rules for contractions are easy.

    LOVE Riker getting manhandled, followed by Whoopi’s “Lal!” as Data enters and Data’s “What are your intentions toward my daughter?”

    The guest actress does a great job throughout, but especially in the scene following her interview with the Admiral.  For a moment, I was worried that Deanna wouldn’t follow her out of the room; there’s enough of a pause that we shouted “go after her!”  And later Deanna says that Lal left her room “for no apparent reason”?  Really?  No one in a state of extreme distress has ever wandered off confusedly in Deanna’s presence?  

    It’s great that the Admiral shows remorse over Lal’s demise.  I almost want to see him explicitly eat his previous jerkwad position that precipitated Lal’s death, but this is more subtle and well done.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *