3.5 — “The Bonding”

3.5 — “The Bonding”

Plot: Disaster strikes an away team as a heretofore undetonated explosive device takes out a staff archaeologist, who leaves behind an orphaned 12-year old son on the Enterprise. Wesley finds that this situation reminds him of losing his own father. Worf feels responsible as a the leader of the away team, and wants to form a relationship with the boy. The ship’s grieving process is complicated when a force from the planet intrudes upon the ship and reaches out to draw the boy down to the surface.

Thoughts: Welcome to Star Trek, Ronald D. Moore. This is Ronald’s first screen credit in television and his first TNG script. He soon joined the production staff for TNG for the remainder of the series, followed by five seasons of DS9 and a brief stint on VOY before moving on to create the Battlestar Galactica reboot franchise, for which he served as showrunner. He eventually wrote or co-write 26 more TNG episodes (a full season’s worth!) and co-wrote the screenplays for Star Trek: Generations and Star Trek: First Contact with Brannon Braga.

Ron came to Star Trek as a fan who had thought a great deal about Star Trek, which is reflected in this script, which tries to answer many questions. What really happens when redshirts die? Do they have families? What is the Enterprise doing out in space? How do the crew feel about their jobs?

When Riker says “That’s part of life in Starfleet, Wesley,” referring danger, and the risk of death, I had another “I don’t know what show I’m watching anymore” moment, in a good way. Pow! Starfleet is reestablished as a vocation that is risky but noble and worthwhile, just like that (and just as if the first two seasons never happened).

Troi suddenly has a useful, responsible role supporting crewmembers through traumas of service. Who said her ministrations have to be limited to the familiar bridge crew? And she expresses her own sense of vocation and purpose, for almost the first time. I’ll leave it to +Randi to evaluate her technique. Worf, too, is shown taking his work more seriously than usual, although he does get a little whiny for a Klingon.

References return to the still-never-fully-explained story of Jack Crusher, and we have a good episode for Wesley that does not involve him nearly destroying the ship by being smarter than everyone else.

On top of this, we have an original story that raises the hair on the back of my neck. Aliens want to turn Jeremy into Charlie X! It’s good that the crew is able to nip this in the bud this time.

The dead lieutenant in the beginning was fairly gory, but I approve under the circumstances. Rare as crew deaths are in this series, deaths of female crew members are even more so, which makes me think of Star Trek’s first female crew death, in TOS 2.22 ”By Any Other Name.”

Eugene and Torie at TheViewscreen.com rated this episode poorly–perhaps they thought it was maudlin (http://www.theviewscreen.com/the-bonding/). I was touched by it, however, and cried a manly tear. I’m not sure I buy Klingons as candlemakers, though. Are open flames allowed on board now, notwithstanding “Up the Long Ladder?”

4 out of 5 calico cats.

http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/The_Bonding


by

Tags:

Comments

6 responses to “3.5 — “The Bonding””

  1. Randi Cohen Avatar

    A cute little episode. Michael Dorn is just such a great actor in this role… not sure if he is perfectly cast or if he is just a great actor generally. And… what a voice!

    Anyway, as far as the episode itself goes, I like the idea behind it… something that always bothered me was how nameless all the “redshirts” were on TOS. I also think Picard is right, it’s kind of weird to have children on an exploration-type starship.

    I would think it would make sense that there be a “next of kin” for the kids on the starship, i.e. that the parents would designate someone to act in loco parentis who is also on the ship in case of emergency or parents being hurt or killed.

    This is the second kid that Worf has volunteered to parent… hopefully that idea doesn’t just end with the episode and we get to see a bit of the whole Klingon parenting (or foster brothering?) dynamic in the future.

    I wish we knew more about the race of energy beings and why they didn’t remove those mines in the first place (since they had a millenium or something to do so) and the whole history of the conflict. It was a bit light on content, as I find most TNG episodes at this point, but I liked the idea of it. It was also nice to see them explore Wesley and Dr. Krusher’s past a bit, although I really don’t like the acting of either actor so in the end it was not that satisfying.

    Oh, and the pop psychology part about “needing to release the anger” was kind of silly. I wish they would consult a real psychologist before coming up with this stuff. Obviously (and I would think obvious to anyone even without any psychological training), the emotion that most needs to be released when one loses a parent is GRIEF. HELLO. (shakes head disbelievingly)

  2. Kevin Black Avatar

    I think it makes some sense to open the ship to families of officers, if the crew is going on a five-year (or ongoing) mission, without regular means of return to a specific home port. Then you aren’t demanding that all of your officers sacrifice the idea of having families (or forming them during the course of their service). It’s like having family housing on military bases. Of course, Beverly is the only character we know of who is taking advantage of this, unless Worf in his off hours is running a hostel for wayward boys, which seems possible at this point. We have heard contradictory but vague messages about Picard and Riker having to sacrifice the idea of family for their chosen career, however, which Kirk also makes a reference to in TOS. This seems like an area where Gene Roddenberry had some ideas that were partially but not fully worked out in the show bible, dutifully referenced in the premiere, and since then studiously ignored and avoided by all of the writers. A precedent set by Michael Hurley, just like we have gone 53 episodes without meaningfully exploring the background of the Troi/Riker and Picard/Crusher relationships? I’d love for a good visionary writer to come along and develop this. What are all the different career paths available in Starfleet, what are the plusses and minuses of each, why do people in general, and our characters in particular, opt for one over the other? Then we wouldn’t have the sense that they were just “born” on the ship, without making choices or sacrifices. Were there kids on Voyager and Deep Space 9?

  3. Kevin Black Avatar

    I agree about Michael Dorn, BTW. I thought he floundered a bit in Season One, especially, when the writers didn’t know what to do with him, but he does have a great voice, and for a character who seemed to be initially defined by one characteristic (anger, touchiness), he is turning into one of the most interesting and nuanced characters on the show.

  4. Randi Cohen Avatar

    There were definitely kids on ds9, in fact the captain had a kid. But that was a space station so it seems different to me.

    Agree re lack of back story on so much, which is a shame because it is not like the episodes are drowning in content at this point.

    I kind of have the idea that picard and Riker are both afraid of relationships and commitment and the whole “giving up family for the job” thing is just something they both hide behind. Riker because in some sense he does not want to give up “playing the field” and Picard because he is made anxious by intimacy.

  5. R. Alex Reutter Avatar

    This promises to be another great episode, created amid concerns over unexploded landmines left behind in war zones.  We’re to deepen our understanding of Worf’s and Wesley’s past losses through the lens of Jeremy’s immediate loss.  Data and Picard get some learning moments about what it means to be human, and Deanna is actually crucial to the emotional story arc.

    Then the inexplicable, all-powerful alien being shows up, and instead of any real soul-searching, we chase the alien around the ship and then talk it into submission.

    Sigh. 

  6. Randi Cohen Avatar

    Yes, victim of the “2 underdeveloped plots instead of one good one” syndrome which seems common to TOS.  I wonder if there is one writer in particular who is responsible for this or it’s a more general thing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *